tdub’s 2012 oscar picks

so instead of writing about politics or gay issues, i’m gonna write about something that doesn’t matter whatsoever in the scope of the world and what’s important: my picks for the Oscars.

if you know me, you know i love movies.

and if you know me well, you know that for me Oscar night is bigger than the Super Bowl, the Grammys, Miss Universe, or a Lord of the Rings Movie Festival.

as usual, the frenetic pace of my life prevented me from seeing all the pics and that frustrates me. i actually only saw 3 of the 9 best pic nominees this year–1 more than i saw last year. i kept meaning to spend an entire Saturday catching up on these and some of the nominated perfs at the art movie house in Dallas but never seemed to get a free saturday. tried to see Hugo once but the boys weren’t interested; could’ve rented Midnight in Paris but i just didn’t take the film seriously–it is woody allen but something about owen wilson? i dunno.

ok so here goes:

Best Picture

of the 9 nominated, i only saw Tree of Life, The Descendants, and The Help. The Artist will win this–just the type of fare Hollywood loves, and i can’t wait to see it. Poor Hugo…Hollywood wanted to love this too.

Best Director

Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist

Best Actor

tough call for me: do i go with CW and go with Jean Dujardin, The Artist or do i go with the perf that finally convinced me that George Clooney is a serious actor in The Descendants (Syriana was awesome and i loved him in Up in the Air). Clooney running down the street just cracked me up and made him seem “not so perfect” to me. having not seen The Artist, it will be hard to judge.

This will go down to the wire for me and will have to wait until my final ballot is due to call it.

(Can’t wait to see A Better Life.)

Best Actress

HANDS DOWN: Viola Davis, The Help. LOVE YOU Meryl, so much, for so many great performances. But Viola deserves this for her honest performance, as much as she did for the supporting statue she should’ve gotten playing opposite you in Doubt. Again, her perf was understated, emotionally evocative, and authentic. Just beautiful. Streep will have to enjoy her Golden Globe this year. I look forward to much more grand work from these women, as well as the others in this category. (And can’t wait to see Albert Knobbs. When will Glenn Close get her due?!)

Best Supporting Actor

Subject-matter alone, Christopher Plummer, Beginners, is my fave here. Of course who doesn’t love Captain Von Trapp?!! this is a movie i anticipate owning. (blog post about this movie forthcoming.) Saddish for vonn Sydow, also 82, because as this category often honors a career, he’s deserving too.

Best Supporting Actress

Again, this one’s a lock: Octavia Spencer, The Help. I loved Chastain in this movie as well and understand McTeer was amazing. and McCarthey–yay, another comedian breaks through–but she got that Emmy win so she’ll have to enjoy that. (Bridesmaids was pretty darn funny.) I loved Spencer in this role, love her as a human being (funny as HECK), and her speeches this year have been inspiring–and funny.

Best Original Screenplay

Ok, i get it. yes, Woody Allen is brilliant. yes, I will see it (even tho I think i will agree 100% with my theater-educated baby brother on his appraisals). and this one will go to Woody Allen for Midnight in Paris.

Best Adapted Screenplay

The Descendants, adapted from the Hemmings’ novel, was really enjoyable to me and deeply affecting without being contrived. i hear Moneyball‘s adaptation was pretty smart along with Clooney & co’s Ides–both movies i really want to see. that said, i can’t think of a smarter adaptation i’ve seen than Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy–but maybe that’s due to the source material. (wow–what an excellent movie and if you haven’t seen it, you should!)

in the end, i’m going with Alexander Payne, Jim Rash, and Nat Faxon for The Descendents as a way to honor the film since it won’t win BP.

Best Editing

The Artist

Best Cinematography

Hands down: The Tree of Life. despite not completely understand most of what i was watching and making fun of myself with Pam after we watched it one night, both refusing to comment or make a joke because we were each afraid the other was getting it and we didn’t want to feel stupid–the movie was sumptuous and brave and just gorgeous. here’s where it will get a little Oscar history. (Malick’s nomination was its other award.)

Best Costume Design

I agree that The Artist will win here, too.

Best Art Direction

This (and the other technical categories) is is where Hugo will get some Oscar love.

Best Original Score

The Artist. the excerpts i’ve heard are beautiful and i’m sure it’s a perfect homage to the era it depicts.

Best Original Song

uhm, excuse me: where-the-heck are the songs from Sir Elton John, Madonna, and Mary J??? of the 2 nominees, i’m going with Man Or Muppet from The Muppets.

Best Makeup

Seems to be little disagreement: The Iron Lady, though i’d love to see Harry Potter get some Oscar gold.

Best Sound Editing

Hugo

Best Sound Mixing

Hugo

Best Visual Effects

Rise of the Planet of the Apes though my heart is with Harry Potter.

Best Foreign-Language Film

A Separation. This is showing in Dallas now and every time i see the preview, i tell myself i’m going to see it…! It will win and then i can go see it.

Best Documentary Feature

I think it comes down to Undefeated and Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory. I love stories like Undefeated (despite its odious Diddy connection) as well as  Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory, about the West Memphis Three. 

Best Animated Feature

Rango, but my heart is with Chico & Rita.

Best Animated Short

i saw all the nominees in this category.

Diamanche/Sunday (Canada) featured sublime animation but for me, an unsatisfying story. A Morning Stroll (based on “The Chicken”) (UK) was quite a trip and is a MUST see. Try to find the whole thing. Wild Life (Canada) felt like watching a painting…it was just so beautiful. La Luna (US), from animation powerhouse Pixar, was wonderful. Not only was its animation lovely and story delightful, the pay-off was just precious.

But my pick of the bunch is The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore (US). In just a few minutes, this short celebrates the love of books. the joy of reading. the fulfillment of creation. and is very timely for me personally. and the animation–oh yeah: beautiful, ESPECIALLY the page turning scenes.

Pixar may steal this but Lessmore deserves it.

Best Live-Action Short 

i was also able to see all of these and for me, predicting the winner is tough. some critics are going with The Shore (N. Ireland); i liked it but felt the acting was a bit…well…college course or community theater–i dunno. Others are going with Raju (Germany/India)–powerful, deeply impactful and touching, and very, very well acted all the way around. Pentecost (Ireland) was funny and relatable with its religious setting, but no where near as as year’s religion-themed nominated short, The Confession which is still haunting. (Incidentally it lost to God of Love by that fro-headed white dude Luke Matheny who i bet has a big future ahead of him). Time Freak (USA) was fun, funny, and got a great audience response.

but my fave of the bunch hands down was Tuba Atlantic (Norway). kudos to the actor who played the main character and to the girl who played the death angel. ahhh what a story and heart-rending ending.

in the end, i’m going with Raju.

Best Documentary Short

This is tough, too, having to go with my gut only. Saving Face or The Tsunami and the Cherry Blossom….. both gripping stories. (Do want to see God is the Bigger Elvis, though!) Will make this call before my official ballot is due.

and there you have it. need to go make cookies for the event and search my heart before i turn in my final ballot. good luck!

(oh and if you text/tweet/FB message me during the telecast, don’t be offended if i don’t return your message. this is very serious stuff.)

it’s oscar night!

besides Christmas, Oscar Sunday is my favorite holiday of the year!

not a holiday you say? (or even an exciting event, like my friend the Gay Groom) well, to me, it is just as much a holiday as any other. and as the minutes tick down, i am getting more and more excited.

have an exciting menu planned…

the outfit all worked out…

all i couldn’t find was a red carpet for our one friend coming over to celebrate.

i don’t know why i like them so much. i remember always watching pageants with my mother as a kid. (my dad only watched because of the “soft porn” via the swimsuit competition.) i acted in high school and once received a “best actor” award at a competition. i’ve always loved movies and get caught up in the history and odds of Oscar.

anyway, it’s time to go get ready, get the hors d’oeuvres going, and tune in the red carpet pre-show.

you can see my predictions here. still on the fence about Supporting Actress. i’m not sure how this Franco/Hathaway thing is gonna work but i’m more than willing to play along.

i’ll be blogging and tweeting during the whole event…geeze i’m so excited!

labels. really?

i don’t guess i’m all that surprised. we gays love our labels.

yes, that’s a stereotype! lots of straights like ‘em too—women and men—whether it’s clothes, rims, glasses, toilet paper, chain saws, you name it: we like labels!

anyway, tonight i participated in a twitter conversation about labels. specifically: labeling what kind of man and how masculine you are based on your sexual position/role. *augh* really? it’s 2011 and we’re still behaving like this?! that’s as ludicrous as the discussions about whether a stay-at-home mom is a better mother than a working mom or the one that occurs within the black community about skin color making someone a more desirable person. (though it’s still debated in circles of many colors,  we’re all beautiful, no matter our skin’s hue and any mom—whether she works outside the home or not—can be an excellent, loving, effective mother. i know several!)

that kind of thinking just hits me wrong. almost as much as describing gays by which “list” they’re on, a notion no-doubt coined by someone who perceives himself to be on the “A-list” [aka “douchebag”] or a person with a poor self-image, whose envy has gotten the best of himself.

and speaking of the notion of an “A-list”—a concept not original to the gays as both the hets and the homos have been keeping lists since, well, Adam, Eve, and, well, Steve—let’s talk about that ridiculous show “the A-list.” no wonder society perceives us they way they do with ill-conceived garbage like this, no doubt the brainchild of some snarky gay hoping to profit by exploiting the negative stereotypes of this particular group of people. that show represents no one i know in real life, only the stereotypes i rue and occasionally mock.

yes: i laugh at these men but not in a good way.  i can empathize with some of their situations but some of their behaviors leave me shaking my head. and trust me: I know many vapid, vacuous people; gays do not have the market cornered on these characteristics.

so back to labeling. yes, some of us are eccentric. many of us dress better than many of our hetero compadres (although this metrosexual thing is really catching on thank goodness). a lot of us express ourselves creatively and talk with our hands and love shoes and secretly love/hate/want to be Martha Stewart and love musicals and The Oscars and sports and believe in the importance of family and are productive members of society and make great neighbors and think of others generously by giving money and time to worthy causes and…

….wait…

i think i just made my point.

but in case i didn’t, let me conclude, in my usual “this is not really a conclusion, i’m still going” mode.

first: masculinity is not defined by sexual position. it is made up of many characteristics, most of which extend far outside the bedroom. [duh. but apparently it needs to be said. again.]

second: stop it with the stereotypes. society loves them and we gays sure love to label people (oops) but really—is it anyone’s business?! yes, i am hypersensitive to labels. i still remember when “Three’s Company” was on TV, becoming one of primetime TV’s earlier attempt to parody homosexuals. (“Soap” preceded it but came on after your local news; i was allowed to watch neither.) The very next day, kids started asking me if i was gay. That was fifth grade. and so it began…

Ok so what. Yeah. i knew then i was gay. (i actually knew much earlier.) But what i didn’t realize then, i finally realize today: i’m also creative. and smart(ish). And sometimes funny. And i love to talk and share and laugh and a million other things that many other humans like to do. my identity as a gay male is just one piece of who i am—not my entire identity. yes, stereotypes are fun to laugh at (although wow Modern Family’s Sofia Vergara and Jessey Tyler Ferguson push them so far that they’re more uncomfortable than funny.) but hey: it’s good for a laugh, right?

at the end of the day, we are not the sum of our labels. we’re all just equal human beings with basically the same DNA, except the precious few deviations that give us our own unique identities, personalities, and traits.

it’s just that some of us have better shoes.